Mechanical

Experience

Bemco Machine Works Ltd. · Baja SAE, Western University

Manufacturing Intern

Bemco Machine Works LTD. · Mississauga, ON  ·  May 2025 – Aug. 2025, May 2026 – Aug. 2026
  • Produced dimensioned CAD models and manufacturing drawings from existing physical components in SolidWorks, reconstructing geometry, tolerances, and GD&T callouts for legacy parts lacking documentation; drawings were released to production and used to manufacture parts.
  • Designed and deployed the shop’s production quality-control system, replacing a paper-based inspection workflow with enforced dimensional verification that hard-stops a job when a reading falls out of spec, staging inspection from casting to first-article to QA-approved-to-ship with blind re-measurement; used daily by 6 machinists across ~10 work orders per day.
  • Operated manual lathes independently across the full job scope, interpreting drawings, planning operation sequence, selecting tooling and speeds/feeds, and performing in-process dimensional inspection to hold specified tolerances.
  • Manufactured precision components on CNC mills and lathes, frequently operating 2–3 machines concurrently and holding tolerances as tight as ±0.001 in.; proposed revised CAD designs of existing components to improve manufacturability and reduce machining operations.
Full-cycle build

Sleeved Roll Training Assembly

SolidWorks · Engineering drawings · Manual and CNC lathe · Assembly

Bemco makes rolls for steel mills, and the sleeved roll is their own design. A solid roll wears out where the impact lands. So the roll gets split into a hub carrying one or two sleeves. A worn sleeve is reversed to use its unworn side, and the two sleeves can be swapped. Two sleeves with two usable sides each is four times the life of a solid roll.

I built scaled training versions of the full two-sleeve assembly. First I modelled the hub, sleeves and ring in SolidWorks. Then I drew them with section views and chamfer callouts, machined the parts on manual and CNC lathes, and put them together to check the fit.

Interactive model, exported from SolidWorks
Loading model…
Exploded assembly: ring, two sleeves and hub.Drag to rotate. Scroll or pinch to zoom.
SolidWorks models and exploded assembly
Ring
Ring
Hub, sectioned to show the bore
Hub, sectioned to show the bore
Sleeve
Sleeve
Exploded assembly. Hub, two sleeves and ring
Exploded assembly. Hub, two sleeves and ring
Manufacturing drawings
Ring. Front, side and isometric with chamfer callout
Ring. Front, side and isometric with chamfer callout
Hub. Section A-A through the bore
Hub. Section A-A through the bore
Sleeve. Inside section with wall thicknesses
Sleeve. Inside section with wall thicknesses
Setup and machining
Working the cut on paper. Depth of cut taken from the diameter difference, taped to the machine
Working the cut on paper. Depth of cut taken from the diameter difference, taped to the machine
Manual lathe setup, three-jaw chuck
Manual lathe setup, three-jaw chuck
Turning in progress
Turning in progress
Machined and assembled
Hub, sleeves and ring together
Hub, sleeves and ring together
Ring
Ring
Hub. Through bore and stepped diameter
Hub. Through bore and stepped diameter
Sleeve and ring
Sleeve and ring
Sleeve, outside diameter finish
Sleeve, outside diameter finish
Sleeve, second view
Sleeve, second view
Hub standing on the bore end
Hub standing on the bore end
Assembled. Sleeves seated on the hub
Assembled. Sleeves seated on the hub
Reverse engineering

From Part to Drawing

Dimensional inspection · SolidWorks · GD&T

A lot of the parts we made had no drawings. They were legacy components, and the only record of the geometry was the part itself. So I measured them and rebuilt them in SolidWorks, geometry, tolerances and GD&T callouts. Those drawings went to the floor and parts were machined from them. That is the part I would point to. If I got a dimension wrong, somebody was going to cut it wrong.

Each pair below is the same component. The part is on the left. The model I built from measuring it is on the right.
Drag or hover across each image to wipe between the physical part and the model built from measuring it.
Disc, the physical partDisc, rebuilt in SolidWorks
The partMy model
Disc. A turned disc with a central boss. Diameters, boss height and bore measured off the part, then rebuilt.
Stepped shaft, the physical partStepped shaft, rebuilt in SolidWorks
The partMy model
Stepped shaft. Five diameters, a keyway and a shoulder flange. Every step and transition measured and reproduced.
Cross-drilled block, the physical partCross-drilled block, rebuilt in SolidWorks
The partMy model
Cross-drilled block. Hex body with angled cross-drilled bores. Rebuilt on multiple reference planes to place the holes correctly.
Slotted cylinder, the physical partSlotted cylinder, rebuilt in SolidWorks
The partMy model
Slotted cylinder. Threaded end, internal bore and an open slot. Wall thickness and slot position taken from the part.
Multi-groove spool, the physical partMulti-groove spool, rebuilt in SolidWorks
The partMy model
Multi-groove spool. Five grooves at matched pitch. Groove profile and spacing measured, then modelled as a repeating feature.
Manufacturing

Machining from Drawings

Manual and CNC lathe · Tolerances to ±0.001 in.

By the second summer I was running manual lathes on my own across the full job. That means reading the drawing, planning the operation sequence, choosing tooling and speeds and feeds, and inspecting in process to hold the tolerance. Nobody was setting it up for me.

Drawings worked from
Supplied drawing on the floor
Supplied drawing on the floor
Dimensions and section detail
Dimensions and section detail
Second sheet
Second sheet
Hand layout of a turned profile
Hand layout of a turned profile
Parts machined to print
Grooved disc, straight off the lathe
Grooved disc, straight off the lathe
Edge on. Groove profile and turning finish
Edge on. Groove profile and turning finish
Stepped diameters turned to print
Stepped diameters turned to print
Finished parts at the bench
Finished parts at the bench
Second pair
Second pair
Part off the machine
Part off the machine
Quality engineering

Production Quality Control System

In daily use by 6 machinists · ~10 work orders per day · Shop-floor tablets

Bemco machines rolls and roll components to tight drawing tolerances. However, the problem I kept noticing wasn't on any machine. Every inspection was recorded on paper, and a measurement only got checked if someone remembered to check it. So I built the system that replaced it. Six machinists use it daily on shop-floor tablets.

The workflow
Work order, casting, inspection, inspector check, QA ship, complete

The office opens a work order with the customer, drawing number, casting count, and the dimensions and tolerances for every operation. On the floor, each casting is screened proceed or not proceed before any machining time goes into it. Operators then log their actual measurements against each dimension, and every reading is checked against the tolerance as it is typed.

Three controls are enforced, not encouraged. Each one is a rule the system applies. None of them depend on somebody remembering.
Office to floor
Work order. Customer, drawing, revision and casting count
1 / 4
1 · Inspector check. The run stays locked after part one until a second person blindly re-measures it
An operator cannot inspect their own work. The system recognises who took the original readings and refuses the check.
1 / 2
2 · Non-conformance hold. An out-of-tolerance reading stops the operation
Caught on entry. A reading outside the band is flagged before it is committed.
1 / 2
3 · Sampling before shipment. And the record the customer receives
10% of parts, minimum one, randomly selected. A failure escalates the whole lot to 100% inspection.
1 / 3

Screens shown use demonstration data. The same system is covered from the software side under Experience › AI & Software.

On-site build

Retaining Wall

Layout · Excavation · Drainage · Material selection

I designed and built a retaining wall sized to stop falling trees. The base excavation was set off the wall height, the gravel drainage layer runs to mid-height with a drain pipe to relieve water pressure behind it, and every second course is set back so the wall resists tipping.

Built on site
Moving block on site
Moving block on site
Setback visible. Each pair of courses steps back into the slope
Setback visible. Each pair of courses steps back into the slope
Along the slope
Along the slope
Drainage side
Drainage side
Finished run
Finished run
Full length
Full length
From the yard
From the yard
Looking back along the finished wall
Looking back along the finished wall
Full run from the far end
Full run from the far end
Site before the wall
Site before the wall

Front Suspension Team (1st Place Overall OktoBAJAfest)

Baja SAE, Western University · London, ON  ·  Sept. 2025 – Present
  • Conducted design and manufacturing of the front suspension for an SAE Baja off-road vehicle by independently researching manufacturing methods and design trade-offs under competition constraints.
  • Improved prior suspension design, contributing to 1st place finishes in Hill Climb (15.72 s), Short Track (24.32 s), Baja Cross (79.07 s), and Endurance under varied dynamic loading conditions.
  • Redesigned and modeled suspension components in SolidWorks, including the spherical plain bearing (uniball), conducting iterative design refinement to optimize strength, manufacturability, and assembly integration.
Uniball modelling
Outer race
Outer race
Assembly constraints in Autodesk Inventor
Assembly constraints in Autodesk Inventor
Spherical ball, allowing multi-axis articulation
Spherical ball, allowing multi-axis articulation